Colorado Tech Times

So long . . .

November 13, 2007 · No Comments

Those of you who were becoming regular readers of Colorado Tech Times earlier this year may have noticed the sudden lapse in postings several months ago.

I realize it’s a bit belated, but I’d like to finally offer some explanation for my sudden vanishing act.

No, it wasn’t a case of Fat Tire overdose (see my last post, below).

In May, I accepted a job as senior writer for the Loomis Group, a San Francisco technology PR firm. Since then, I simply haven’t had the time to make further posts to this blog. And considering some other duties I’ve taken on since then, that doesn’t appear likely to change anytime soon.

Oddly enough, the blog continues to draw readers – as many as 50 a day. So even though I’m no longer posting additional material to this forum, I’ve decided to leave the site and its postings online as a reference for those seeking information about Colorado’s technology industry.

It was fun. I’d love to do it again sometime when time permits. But for now, you’ll have to look elsewhere for news on Colorado’s burgeoning tech sector. For starters, I’d suggest checking out some of the links along the right side of this page.

Best,

- Russ -

→ No CommentsCategories: Blogging · Colorado tech

Colorado’s craft beer rules!

April 13, 2007 · No Comments

Some readers may argue that brewing beer isn’t really a high-tech occupation.

To that I can only say: Bah humbug!

My college roomate and I tried brewing our own back in the late 1970s — cooking the ingredients on the kitchen stove, bottling it in previously used Hamm’s bottles and aging it in a closet. The disastrous results convinced me that brewing is truly a complex, highly technical process.

And besides, how many software programs, semiconductor designs and computer systems do you think would ever have been completed without frequent sessions of “beer therapy?”

In any event, Coloradans have reason to be proud of our homegrown craft brewing industry.

The Boulder-based Brewers Association (see http://www.beertown.org/) this week released a list of the country’s top 50 “craft brewers,” a term that refers to the smaller, independent and traditional breweries that have become the fastest growing segment of the U.S. brewing industry. The association reports that sales of craft beer in U.S. supermarkets grew 17.8% in 2006, compared with just 10% for wine and a mere 2% growth for “ordinary” domestic beer from the industry’s big four producers (Anheuser-Busch, Miller, Coors and Pabst).

Colorado, it turns out, is home to five of the 50 largest U.S. craft brewers. Only California, with seven top-50 brewers, has more. (If all the smaller brewers are counted, Colorado actually has closer to 100 commerical micro-breweries)

Fort Collins’ New Belgium Brewing Company Inc., maker of the extremely popular Fat Tire beer, ranks as the third-largest U.S. craft brewer in terms of 2006 sales. Actual sales figures were not disclosed as part of the rankings, but a Denver Post article last July reported that New Belgium brewed about 370,000 barrels of beer in 2005, while Inc. magazine reported last year that the progressively managed, eco-friendly company had 2005 sales of about $70 million.

Following is a list of Colorado’s Top-50 craft brewers, and their rankings:

      Company…………………City……….Rank

_______________________________

  • New Belgium…………………Fort Collins……3
  • Rock Bottom Brewery…..Louisville……..24
  • Flying Dog…………………….Denver…………29
  • Odell Brewing……………….Fort Colllins….31
  • Breckenridge Brewery…..Denver………….36
  • Boulder Beer…………………Boulder…………41

Source: Brewers Association

_______________________________

“Beer made by small, independent and traditional breweries is definitely an American success story,” says Paul Gatza, Director of the Brewers Association.

With just under 1400 small breweries the segment eclipsed 6.7 million barrels in 2006. The fastest growing craft beer sector in 2006, with a 16% sales increase, was microbreweries (those under 15,000 barrels a year). Total craft beer industry sales have grown 31.5% over the past 3 years.fattire2.jpg

The Denver Post reported that brewers contribute $3.7 billion a year to this state’s economy, although the bulk of that no doubt comes from the Coors and Anheuser-Busch operations here.

Nonetheless, my hat’s off to all the dedicated beer makers whose bubbly brews make our lives — and the technology industry — so much better (when consumed in moderation). I plan to open an ice-cold Fat Tire a few hours from now in celebration.

→ No CommentsCategories: Beverages · Colorado tech · Innovation

Simtek’s Q1 sales slip

April 12, 2007 · No Comments

Colorado Springs-based Simtek Corp. (Nasdaq: SMTK) expects to report sequentially lower sales during the year’s first fiscal quarter, for which full earnings results will be announced April 27.

The non-volatile memory chip company announced this week that it expects Q1 2006 product revenue to be about $8 million, 12% less than the record $9.1 million mark reached during last year’s fourth quarter.

Despite the decline, the company’s projected Q1 sales would be 70% more than last year’s first quarter. Simtek — which reported its first quarterly profit in nearly six years during last year’s fourth quarter — nearly tripled its annual revenue during 2006 to $30.6 million, compared with $10.4 million in 2005.

The past year has been eventful for Simtek, which was founded in 1987 and struggled for years to develop a niche market for its unique nvSRAM technology, which allows memory chips to retain stored data when their power is shut off, while also operating at extremely fast speeds.

Last October the company completed a 1-for-10 reverse stock split, paving the way for a Nasdaq stock listing this January 10.

In December Simtek acquired the nvSRAM business of Germany’s Zentrum Mikroelektronik Dresden (ZMD) (which originally licensed the technology from Simtek) for $10 million in cash and stock, and began shifting ZMD’s chip customers to its own nvSRAM chips. In January it raised $11 million in a private share placement, with most of the proceeds used to pay for the ZMD deal.

The company also filed for 10 patents in January, and announced plans to open a design and business-development center in San Diego.

Simtek employs about 45 people in Colorado Springs. Its chips are used in computer servers, GPS navigation systems, robotics, copiers, avionics, radar, “smart” weapons and other products.

Among its competitors is Colorado Springs-based Ramtron Corp. (Nasdaq: RMTR), which uses a different technology, ferroelectric random access memory (FRAM), to produce non-volatile chips.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Investing · Semiconductors

Wind-energy stock tips

April 11, 2007 · 2 Comments

Colorado features prominently in an article this week on wind-power transmission stocks in the AltEnergyStocks.com blog.

Written by investment advisor Tom Konrad, who also serves as treasurer for both the Colorado Renewable Energy Society and Ratepayers United Colorado, the article identifies several companies (though none in this state) that could benefit from increased demand for transmission facilities. That’s assuming, of course, that the current boom in wind power and other alternative energy sources continues.

The article mentions Colorado’s recently passed Senate Bill 100, which requires regulated electric utilities to identify — and develop plans to remedy — areas of high wind-energy potential where a lack of transmission capacity could hinder development. Gov. Bill Ritter signed the bill into law two weeks ago, along with House Bill 1281, which requires state utilities to obtain at least 20% of their electricity from renewable energy sources by 2020.

The AltEnergyStocks blog also ran an article last week on stocks that could benefit from wind turbine supply constraints. Investor’s Business Daily mentions some of the same stocks in a similar article today.

Turbine makers such as GE Energy are reportedly booked solid with orders well into next year, despite the industry’s aggressive plans to expand production. Denmark’s Vestas Wind Systems, for instance, announced plans last month to build its first U.S. wind turbine blade factory in Windsor, Colo., near Fort Collins.

Surging demand for wind energy may pose a challenge for utilities and potential wind farm investors, but for transmission equipment suppliers, as well as Vestas, GE and other turbine suppliers, the good times appear to be just beginning to roll.

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Energy and environment · Investing

Denver hosts Green Grid meeting

April 10, 2007 · No Comments

Denver will play host next week to the first technical summit of The Green Grid, a non-profit consortium dedicated to advancing energy efficiency in computer data centers.

Energy use is a growing concern for Google, Yahoo, Microsoft and other big computer users, which are building huge data centers around the globe to handle soaring demand for broadband Internet services. Google engineer Luiz André Barroso has predicted, in fact, that energy costs may soon surpass the cost of computing equipment for large users.

The April 18-19 Green Grid event is expected to bring together leading technical experts from founding companies AMD, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, and Sun Microsystems. Longmont-based Copan Systems, Inc., a privately held maker of energy-efficient disk storage sysytems, was one of nearly 30 additional new members announced this week, including Brocade Communications, Cisco, Juniper Networks, Novell, QLogic, Texas Instruments and others.

This will be the first event for the organization since its launch this February. The two-day summit’s three main goals are: how to define and measure data-center efficiency, how to build more efficient data centers and how to improve the efficiency of daily operations.

EE Times reports that one possible solution the group may debate is shifting data centers from AC to DC power. While Intel has been touting that idea recently, Google has been pushing another approach calling for the computer industry to replace a wide variety of multi-voltage power supplies with standard, more efficient 12-volt power supplies.

For more information, see the Green Grid website: http://www.thegreengrid.org/.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Computing · Electronics · Energy and environment · Storage

NREL prizewinner: solar at ‘critical’ stage

April 6, 2007 · No Comments

Lawrence Kazmerski, director of the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Center for Photovoltaics at the Golden-based National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) sees the U.S. solar energy industry at a “critical stage,” with future progress dependent on continued government and university research.

kazmersky2.jpg

Kazmerski — who spoke Thursday at the University of Delaware after receiving the Karl Böer Solar Energy Medal of Merit and a $40,000 prize — says the energy department’s recently unveiled Solar America Initiative was a major turning point for solar energy in this country. Last month the DOE announced it would provide up to $168 million for 13 industry-led solar energy research projects.

“It’s kind of like Nixon going to China,” he said in an article reported by the university’s daily newspaper. “A lot of people would not associate President Bush with renewable energy and anything like this, but he did make this initiative, part of which is in solar.”

Kazmerski said the new initiative positions the United States to be “a major player” in developing affordable solar energy technology, but notes that federal funding for solar technology development is just starting to recover from years of cutbacks. Last year’s $139 million merely brought the level of federal solar research funding even with what it was in 1982.

“Photovoltaics is at a tipping point, and right now it’s at a very critical stage [in] what happens and how fast this technology disseminates,” he said.

Kazmerski joined NREL’s predecessor, the Solar Energy Research Institute, in 1977 and has been director of its photovoltaics center since 1999. He also has been an adjunct professor at the University of Colorado, Colorado School of Mines and the University of Denver.

He said he plans to donate the money from the award to start a program for university students to conduct research at NREL.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Energy and environment · Public policy

Sorry, tech visas are all gone

April 5, 2007 · No Comments

An article in yesterday’s Electronic News notes that the fiscal 2008 U.S. quota for H-1B visas — which allow scientists, engineers, computer programmers and other skilled workers from around the world to to work here for limited periods — was filled in just two days.

Visa applications were accepted starting April 2, and within two days the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) received about 150,000 applications — more than twice the maximum 65,000 new visas alotted for the entire upcoming year. An additional 20,000 applicants with a US-earned masters or higher degree are considered exempt from the cap, but the USCIS is not sure yet how many of the initial rush of applicants met that criteria.

Meanwhile, I’d estimate that close to one-fourth of the enrollment in my children’s Colorado schools these days are the children of illegal Mexican and Central American immigrants (that’s just the illegals — the total Latino school-age population is closer to 40%). These are not, for the most part, the children of H-1B applicants.

You can’t blame these families for wanting to come here, where the jobs are plentiful and the quality of life is far better than in their own poverty-stricken countries. Yet this influx of illegal immigrants is putting a real strain on our schools, health care and law enforcement systems.

You have to wonder what U.S. immigration policies (or the lack thereof) are trying to accomplish.

Clearly there are legitimate questions that need to be addressed about the efficacy and aims of the H-1B program, which if not properly regulated could depress wages and cost the jobs of U.S. scientists and engineers.

On the other hand, our universities simply aren’t turning out enough top-notch graduates in these fields, at least not graduates with U.S. citizenship, and the only way many of our companies are getting by is by recruiting foreign scientists and engineers.

Boulder venture capitalist Brad Feld, for one, says he’s constantly trying to find enough qualified software developers for companies he’s investing in. “There is just no reason why there should be a quota on this type of H-1B visa,” he writes in his Feld Thoughts blog.

What’s more beneficial to the U.S. economy — skilled scientists and engineers who boost the productivity and innovation of our knowledge-based economy, or the mostly uneducated throngs that pour across our southern border in search of menial labor?

Why are the best and brightest applicants limited to a relative trickle, while the doors are thrown virtually wide open for millions of the world’s poor, huddled masses?

Immigration is a complex, emotional issue that could emerge as a major factor in next fall’s presidential elections. And I don’t pretend to have all, or even most, of the answers.

But it’s time for us to begin dealing rationally with the nearly insatiable desire of foreign nationals to work here, and U.S. companies’ eagerness to employ them. Surely we can be smarter and more deliberate about harnessing that supply and demand, and directing this remarkable influx of human talent towards goals that further the best interests of the United States.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Economic development · Public policy

AirCell still expects in-flight cellular service

April 4, 2007 · No Comments

Despite yesterday’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC)  decision not to lift a ban on cellphone use on airliners, Louisville’s AirCell LLC is still hoping to offer in-flight cellphone service in the not-too-distant future.

In a Wall Street Journal article yesterday, AirCell’s CEO Jack Blumenstein says that U.S. airlines should soon begin offering in-flight Internet service, instant messaging and wireless email. And while government approval of cellphone service is now stalled, “the likelihood of cellphone service on airplanes coming into play is still very high,” he says.

Privately held AirCell, founded in 1991, paid $31.3 million at an FCC auction last June for three megahertz of radio frequency spectrum to be used for in-flight Internet service. Both the FCC and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) have approved the company’s Internet service, but not its propsed cellphone service.

The FAA reportedly is concerned that cell phones and other portable electronic devices could interfere with navigational and communications systems, while the FCC worries that airborne cellphone signals could overload networks on the ground. The Journal reports, however, that some 30 countries have now given telecom approval for in-flight calls, although air-safety reviews are still ongoing. Quantas, Emirates and Ryanair are reportedly hoping to begin offering in-flight cellular service before the end of this year.

Meanwhile, AirCell is constructing a network of 80 to 100 ground towers across the U.S. that could eventually provide both voice and data in-flight services. It is reportedly pitching the service to multiple airlines, although no customers have been announced. The company, which currently provides satellite phone service to private jets, holds a U.S. patent on technology to allow in-flight use of both GSM and CDMA cell phones.

AirCell’s North American air-to-ground broadband system is scheduled to debut in early 2008, allowing airline passengers to surf the Internet, use e-mail, and connect to corporate networks using WiFi-equipped laptops, handsets and other devices. It reportedly costs $100,000 to equip each airliner, although the process is relatively simple, and can be done by maintenance workers overnight.

Boeing spent $1 billion several years ago to launch its Connexion in-flight Internet service, but closed the business last year after users balked at paying steep charges of $10 per hour, or $27 per 24-hour period. AirCell’s Blumenstein says his company plans to charge no more than $10 a day to passengers, who also will be able to use their memberships in existing WiFi service programs like T-Mobile, iPass and Boingo.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Communications · Internet

CU prof questions private equity profits

April 3, 2007 · No Comments

During a week when Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. agreed to pay $25.6 billion for Greenwood Village-based First Data Corp. — the second- biggest leveraged buyout ever — some are questioning whether private equity firms are paying their fair share of taxes.

And one of the voices speaking in favor of increased taxation is University of Colorado Law School Associate Professor Victor Fleischer.

An editorial in Monday’s New York Times cites a recent paper by Fleischer presenting several arguments against the current U.S. practice of taxing private equity “performance pay” as capital gains, rather than as ordinary income. The distinction is important because capital gains are taxed at a modest 15% rate, less than half the rate of most other corporate and personal income.

Reuters, Bloomberg and Wall Street’s Dealbreaker blog also have picked up on Fleischer’s blog comments regarding the Blackstone Group’s proposed public stock offering, which is controversially structured to allow it to keep its favorable tax rates.

Private equity certainly looms as a large and tempting target these days. But what bothers most critics is not so much the favorable tax rate on the returns from “at risk” money used to fund the buyout deals. What really draws their ire is the industry’s customary “two and twenty” — a hefty 20% of deal profits and 2% of funds under management — that private equity managers collect for their services. Those fees also are taxed at the favorable 15% capital gains tax rate, rather than as ordinary income.

“This quirk in the tax law allows some of the richest workers in the country to pay tax on their labor income at a low rate,” writes Fleischer.

Private equity investors such as KKR, Blackstone, the Carlyle Group and Texas Pacific Group, having raised hundreds of billions of dollars in cheap capital in recent years, are now pouring it into a flurry of acquisitions at a record-setting pace. There’s much debate about whether deal values are getting too high, and about the ultimate social impacts as hundreds of companies are privatized, broken up, downsized and re-sold, often for huge profits.

Those issues aside, however, one reason for the recent private equity boom is almost certainly the favorable tax treatment these deals, and their architects, receive.

The New York Times editorial calls for Congress to address the issue of private equity’s “preferential” tax rate. And Sen. Charles Grassley (Rep.-Iowa) is reportedly considering just that. British lawmakers also are considering tax changes to collect a bigger share of private equity profits.

Fleischer, writing this week in the Conglomerate business law blog, says he’s “agnostic” about whether the preferential capital gains rate on private equity investment capital is appropriate. “But I certainly agree that allowing that preferential rate for capital gains on returns to human capital (i.e. labor income) is excessive,” he says.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Mergers/Acquisitions · Public policy · Venture capital

Buckets of cash for Photobucket?

April 2, 2007 · No Comments

The blogosphere and the mainstream press are abuzz with speculation about the expected sale of Denver-based photo-sharing startup Photobucket Inc., and how much the fast-growing company may be worth.

photobucket.gif

Michael Arrington’s TechCrunch blog reports that Photobucket has hired investment bank Lehman Brothers to explore a possible sale of the company, which he says could be worth $400 million or more. Pretty amazing for a company with less than $10 million in sales last year.

Arrington hasn’t disclosed the source of his revenue data and projections for the company, which leads some to suspect the bankers may have leaked the data to help prime the market for a sale. His data, which includes no profit/loss information, indicates that Photobucket’s sales climbed from $4.4 million in 2005 to $9.3 million in 2006, and should reach $32 million this year. About 74% of Q4 2006 sales reportedly came from advertising.

Commentators at ValleyWag, HipMojo and the Daily Deal’s blog doubt that Photobucket can sell for as much as $400 million. Blogger Simon Brocklehurst, on the other hand, sees potential for an even higher price. “If pushed into it by a bidding war, I’d say that someone might be prepared to pay north of $600M - maybe even up to a $1B,” he writes.

So exactly who and what is Photobucket?

The company — which has its technology, development and operations functions in Denver and a business and sales office in Palo Alto, Calif. — basically allows people to store a limited number of photos and videos online for free, or larger amounts for $25 yearly. The stored images can then be linked to from anywhere on the Internet, and are especially popular with users of social media websites such as MySpace and Facebook.

Photobucket’s website currently reports 39 million registered users (it’s reportedly aiming for 60 million by year-end), 17.6 million unique site visitors per month and 7 million images uploaded daily.

In an effusive article last week, Fortune senior editor David Kirkpatrick called Photobucket “the most important site on the Internet that hardly anybody understands.” Critics worry the company could be hurt if MySpace and Facebook were to stop accepting its links. But Kirkpatrick sees that as an improbable prospect, which would likely provoke a “user revolt.”

Co-founders Alex Welch and Darren Crystal were software engineers at Denver’s Level 3 Communications, Inc. before starting Photobucket in 2003. CEO Welch, 30, earned a business administration degree from Colorado State University. Chief technical officer Crystal studied electrical engineering at the University of Texas and was a network engineer for computer maker Dell Inc. before joining Level 3.

The two used savings, credit cards and money borrowed from Welch’s parents to start the company in Crystal’s basement. Welch writes in a recent article for the eventuring website of the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation that they got early financing from a neighbor’s friend at Guaranty Bank in Longmont, after venture capitalists turned them down. Later venture funding eventually came from New York’s Insight Venture Partners and MenloPark, Calif.-based Trinity Ventures

Red Herring magazine reported recently that Welch has a previous connection with photography. He used to work for a Colorado rafting company, taking pictures as boats floated by. Today his company operates the world’s largest photo-sharing site, which as of February employed about 60 people, including 45 in downtown Denver.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Innovation · Internet · Mergers/Acquisitions · Venture capital

Secure64 Software attracts attention

March 30, 2007 · No Comments

Greenwood Village-based Secure64 Software Corp. continues to attract impressive press coverage for its Internet security software.

secure64-logo.jpg

Last week the company was featured in a Wall Street Journal article describing how the latest computer processor chips from Intel and AMD offer new ways to protect servers from computer viruses and other attacks. The article quotes Colorado State University computer-science professor Daniel Massey, who has been running the Secure64 software for more than a year, as saying: “nobody can get into this box.”

Another article this week in SEO/SEM Journal examines, but does not confirm, the company’s claim to offer the world’s only “genuinely secure” operating system. Other recent coverage of the company has appeared in Network World, c/net and The Register.

Secure64 claims that its $9,995 Secure64 DNS software — the initial version of which runs only on Itanium-based Hewlett-Packard Integrity rx2660 computers — can withstand denial-of-service attacks while still responding to more than 100,000 legitimate queries per second.

The software, which has several patents pending, protects domain name system (DNS) Internet directories while allowing users to manage email, web access and e-commerce services.

It’s no accident that Secure64’s first products target HP’s Itanium-based servers. The company’s chief technology officer, William Worley, was an HP Fellow and chief scientist and one of the key architects of Itanium technology, which was developed in Fort Collins.

The company, which started in 2002 and now has 23 employees, has raised $7.5 million in angel funding and reportedly plans to seek $5 million to $10 million in additional funds soon.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Computing · Software

Springs group seeks more biotech buzz

March 30, 2007 · No Comments

When it comes to biotech, Colorado Springs tends to be overshadowed by the bigger life-sciences industry clusters up the road in Denver and Boulder. But the Springs’ biotech industry appears to be building momentum.

This week a new chapter of the Colorado Bioscience Association (CBSA) launched in Colorado Springs, with support from the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs (UCCS) and the Colorado Springs Economic Development Corp. (EDC).

The group, which met for the first time Wednesday, aims to provide support to existing bioscience companies, help recruit new ones and work with UCCS to commercialize new technologies.

“With over 25 bioscience companies already here and more in the pipeline, we will continue to invest in this industry,” says EDC CEO Mike Kazmierski. “We see it as a vital part of our future.”

Colorado Springs bioscience companies include, among others: Aspire Biotech, HemoGenix, Nextgen Pharmatechnologies, Analytic Development Corp., and Pyxant Labs Inc.

For more CBSA information, contact Executive Director Denise Brown, Tel: 303-592-4073, or http://www.cobioscience.com.

→ No CommentsCategories: Biotech · Colorado tech · Economic development

Revolutionary running shoes?

March 28, 2007 · No Comments

Inside Triathlon magazine has an interesting interview this week with Danny Abshire, co-founder and owner of Boulder’s Newton Running, which is trotting out a new line of running shoes at this weekend’s Ford Ironman 70.3 race in Oceanside, California.newton3.jpg

The company claims that its shoes — named for Sir Isaac Newton and his laws of physics — return an average of 58% of a runner’s energy to their stride compared with typical running shoes’ 42% energy return. In development for a decade, they use a so-called “active membrane” that stretches on impact and then returns to its original shape, pushing “actuator lugs” in the soles outward and returning energy into forward propulsion.

Most runners, however, will have to adjust their technique from landing heels first, to landing on their forefoot, which the company contends is how we all naturally run when barefoot.

Newton’s running team of elite triathletes claims to be running faster and covering more ground since switching to the new shoes.

Four models are available initially, in limited sizes and quantites, through Newton’s website, www.newtonrunning.com, and at Abshire’s Active Imprints shop in Boulder. Prices range from $155 to $175 a pair.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Innovation · Sports technology

AeA issues U.S. tech warning

March 28, 2007 · No Comments

Today, for the second time in two years, the American Electronics Association (AeA) issued a strident call for U.S. education reform, greater investment in basic science and technology research and a more lenient visa system to encourage the world’s best and brightest engineers and entrepreneurs to come here to pursue their careers.

In a report entitled “We are still losing the competitive advantage” (see full pdf copy here, or executive summary here), the Santa Clara, Calif-based organzation noted that although awareness of America’s lagging tech competitiveness appears to have increased, very little actual progress has been made.

Congress introduced numerous bills during the last session calling for visa reform, increased R&D investment and improved science, technology, engineering, and math education. But as the report notes: “Not one of these bills was passed or ever seriously debated.”

In a letter accompanying the report, AeA CEO William Archey and Chairman Timothy Guertin describe the United States as “the proverbial frog in the pot of water, oblivious to the slowly rising temperature of a world catching up to us. Today, the heat is still rising and we are still in the pot. There is hope that we are finally feeling the heat and are poised to do something about it. Hope, but not certainty.”

Numerous signs of declining U.S. competitiveness are evident right here in the Mile-High state.

Keep reading →

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Economic development · Education · Electronics · Innovation · Public policy

AeA recommendations

March 28, 2007 · No Comments

Today’s AeA’s report on U.S. competitiveness offers two tiers of public-policy recommendations, ranked in order of priority.

The first tier suggests immediate changes that already have been introduced in various bills and appear to have widespread bipartisan support. The second tier is more challenging, having generally not yet been introduced as legislation, or having the same degree of bipartisan support. Nonetheless, the group describes these longer-range measures as “equally critical” to long-term American competitiveness.

1st Tier Recommendations:

  • Dramatic improvements in U.S. education
    • Improve K-12 math and science instruction
    • Sustain, strengthen, and reauthorize the No Child Left Behind Act
    • Promote undergraduate and graduate science, technology, engineering, and math education
    • Create a Human Capital Investment Tax Credit to promote continuous education
  • Support and increase research and development
    • Increase federal funding for physical science, engineering, math, and computer science basic research through the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Defense
    • Strengthen the R&D tax credit and make it permanent
  • Enact High-skilled visa reform
    • Lower barriers for high-skilled individuals to get temporary work visas
    • Give green cards to all U.S.-educated master and doctoral students

2nd Tier Recommendations:

  • Create a more business-friendly environment in the U.S.
    • Reduce the “onerous and disproportionate” tax that small- and medium-size companies incur by complying with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
    • Address rising health-care costs through initiatives such as electronic medical records
    • Fully fund the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to reduce lag time between patent filing and approval
  • Engage proactively in the global trade system
    • Advance free and fair trade policies and agreements and conclude the Doha Round of global trade talks
    • Renew the President’s trade promotion authority
    • Promote stronger worldwide enforcement of intellectual property protection
  • Promote broadband diffusion
    • Offer industry incentives to promote broadband diffusion
    • Ensure affordable broadband access for every American within five years

A parting thought from the report:

“When one of America’s strongest competitive advantages in the global marketplace is a knowledge-based economy, it does not bode well for the future when the United States neglects the infrastructure that supports its wealth creation.”

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Economic development · Education · Electronics · Innovation · Internet · Public policy

A modest milestone

March 28, 2007 · No Comments

Today Colorado Tech Times attracted its 1,000th viewer, and surged right on past that modest milestone.

Obviously that’s still a long, long way from catching up with the blogosphere’s leading sites, some of which reportedly attract millions of readers. But the growth thus far has been steady and encouraging, with readership now approaching 100 viewers per day.

That’s not so bad, I suppose, for something launched scarcely a month ago with zero capital expense, zero advertising and publicized only by a bit of email networking and word of mouth. Granted, there’s also been no income thus far, and it’s yet to be seen whether, or for how long, I’ll be able to continue doing daily blog stories on top of my paid freelance magazine work.

For now, I’d have to say the jury’s still out on Colorado Tech Times. Virtually all of the feedback has been positive to date, and I’m still having fun writing about an interesting, vital subject in such a new, unfiltered medium.

On the other hand, I hope to eventually get some sponsorship and be able to, as they say, “monetize” the project. So there’s much I still need to learn about the subject of making money in the blogosphere.

Wish me luck, and stay tuned for further developments.

- Russ Arensman -

→ No CommentsCategories: Blogging · Colorado tech · Internet

Digital TV shift to hit the rural West?

March 27, 2007 · No Comments

EE Times writer Dylan McGrath notes in an article yesterday that the looming shift from analog to digital TV transmissions — currently scheduled for February 2009 — could impact rural and difficult-to-penetrate mountain communities in the West that depend on translators to re-broadcast weak signals.

While some of you big-city folks out there may be worrying that the shift to digital will render your older analog TV tuners useless without a converter box, the article suggests that many of us living out in the sticks could lose broadcast TV signals entirely. That’s because the FCC currently exempts translator stations from the costly mandate of having to convert to digital transmissions.

Such a mandate could be a somewhat moot point anyway, since many translators are operated by local governments and non-profit community groups, which may not be able to afford the $5,000 to $25,000 conversion cost.

So what’s the impact likely to be in places like my own Glenwood Springs? Not much.

Nearly everyone here already relies on either Comcast cable or Dish and DirectTV satellite services. The nearest Grand Junction TV signals are too weak and fuzzy to be worth watching, and Denver TV signals are non-existent on this side of the Continental Divide.

Similarly, most other American viewers are likely to view the shift with a big yawn, since most now get their TV from either cable or satellite services. A Neilsen Co. study released this month reports that the average U.S. home now receives 104.2 TV channels — up from 18 in 1985 and 61 in 2000. And you can bet those channels aren’t being delivered via the good old rabbit-ears antenna.

My sympathy to those still watching free broadcast TV. But for the majority of us who long ago got used to paying $50-plus a month for TV service, the coming shift to digital TV should be pretty much a non-event.

→ No CommentsCategories: Broadcasting · Colorado tech · Public policy

WisperTel reaches south

March 26, 2007 · No Comments

Evergreen’s Wisper Telecommunications, Inc. has acquired KLNT Enterprises LLC, which provides wireless Internet service under the name BroadSpoke in and around southwest Littleton and Morrison. Acquisition terms were not disclosed.

The deal marks yet another expansion for WisperTel, which earlier this month bought Broomfield’s Path / Broadband Services, Inc., allowing it to expand into Denver’s northwest suburbs.

WisperTel uses pre-WiMAX and WiMAX broadband wireless technology to provide broadband services to suburban and rural communities that tend to be under-served by other Internet providers. The service uses low-power radio signals to send and receive Internet data at speeds of up to seven megabits per second from small antennas mounted at users’ homes or offices.

The company now provides service to nearly 4,000 subscribers over a 3,000 square-mile area.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Communications · Internet · Mergers/Acquisitions

Fuel cell company acquired

March 26, 2007 · No Comments

Broomfield-based fuel cell maker Mesoscopic Devices LLC has agreed to be acquired for $12.4 million in cash and stock by Protonex Technology Corp.

Southborough, Mass.-based Protonex, which sells portable, low cost fuel cell systems to the U.S. military and commercial customers, expects the deal to enhance its technology portfolio, accelerate product development and open new markets.

Mesoscopic’s technical team will now focus mainly on its industry-leading solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology, which uses solid-state materials to generate electricity directly from chemical reactions. SOFC fuel cells operate at higher temperatures than conventional membrane-based fuel cells and can use widely available propane, gasoline and diesel as fuel.

The acquisition, scheduled to close this weekend, is contingent upon Protonex raising additional funds from institutional and strategic investors in a secondary stock offering. The company is seeking to raise $15 million to $25 million by selling new shares. Following that, Mesoscopic’s owners are to receive $3.2 million in cash and the balance in new Protonex shares.

Protonex (PXT.L) raised $16.2 million last July with an initial public offering on the London Stock Exchange’s Alternative Investment Market. The Mesoscopic purchase is its first strategic investment since going public.

Protonex lost $5.7 million on revenue of $2.3 million during 2006. Privately held Mesoscopic Devices reported a profit of $100,000 and revenue of $3.2 million during 2006.

Earlier this month Protonex was awarded awarded a $3.5 million contract to develop a 250-watt portable fuel cell power source for the U.S. Army. The contract was the company’s largest to date, and brought the value of its total government contracts to more than $11 million.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Energy and environment · Mergers/Acquisitions

Ready or not, gender-selection has arrived

March 26, 2007 · 2 Comments

Denver Post columnist David Harsanyi poses the question today: “Would you pick the gender of your child if the technology was available?”baby_pic.jpg

Dave’s question may be slightly premature for most of us, but not because the technology doesn’t exist.

 

For more than a decade Fort Collins-based XY Inc. has been assisting in the conception of a wide array of sex-selected cattle and horses. More recently the company’s patented sperm-sorting technology has been applied to cats and dogs, dolphins, elk and even water buffalo.

This month the company announced the birth of the world’s first dogs to have their sex selected prior to conception. The resulting litter of black Labrador puppies — three female and two male — was a partly successful effort to produce more females, which are preferred over males for service-dog work because of their intelligence and calm temperament.

The mixed litter shows the current limits to XY’s technology, which can significantly increase the odds of a specific gender being conceived, but does not offer a 100% success rate. Yet the company typically guarantees at least a 90% accuracy rate in cattle and horses, where the technology has been rigorously field-tested in breeding for many years.

XY — which began in 1996 as a joint venture between Cytomation Inc., and Colorado State University — describes itself as the global leader in sex-selection technology for “non-human mammals.” Other vendors, however, are plunging ahead into the tricky field of human sex-selection for profit.

As Harshanyi notes, numerous fertility clinics in Colorado and elsewhere already offer gender-selection services, which mainly rely on selecting embryos with the desired gender during in-vitro fertilization. Sperm-sorting technology, at least theoretically, does away with the need to destroy viable embryos, by assuring that only sperm with the desired gender traits are given a chance to procreate.

Human sex-selection opens a Pandora’s box of ethical and legal issues, which for reasons of time and space I won’t try to sort through now. For a a look at some of the ongoing debate, check out Jennifer Lahl’s recent post about the “Top Ten Objections to Sex Selection” at The Human Future blog, or the International Center for Technology Assessment’s assertion that “a new eugenics age” already has begun.

One thing’s for sure, though. Where there’s demand, a market is certain to follow. And many would-be parents appear eager to choose the gender of their offspring.

Companies such as The Fertility Clinics — with locations in Los Angeles, Las Vegas and Mexico — advertise aggressively on the Internet and reportedly are attracting well-heeled customers from around the globe, who gladly pay $20,000 for in-vitro gender selection.

Sperm-sorting technology, still considered experimental by the FDA, reportedly costs $4,000 to $6,000, not including in vitro fertilization. The New York Times says that one Virginia clinic has produced more than 900 pregnancies, with a 91% success ratio for parents who wanted girls, and 76% for those who wanted boys.

So move over dogs, cats, horses and dolphins. Ready or not, the brave new world of human sex selection has now arrived. Can designer babies be far behind?

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Biotech · Colorado tech · Public policy

Lawmakers kill math/science bill

March 24, 2007 · No Comments

In at least a temporary setback to the state’s technology industry, Colorado lawmakers on Thursday killed a proposed bill that would have required all high school students to take four years of math and three years of science before graduating. Many schools now require only two years of each subject.

Although few if any tech executives spoke in favor of the bill, SB-131, the presidents of the University of Colorado and Colorado State University supported the bill, saying that state high schools are graduating students that do not meet their universities’ entrance requirements, much less those of top-tier schools such as Stanford and Harvard.

The bill’s sponsors — Sen. Josh Penry, R-Grand Junction and Rep. Rob Witwer, R-Genessee — noted correctly that the United States is losing its edge in engineering and science to other countries, particularly China and Japan. They contend that raising high school math and science requirements would help reverse that trend.

Opponents, however, argued against what they saw as a piecemeal approach to revising school standards one or two subjects at a time, and worried that other programs such as art or foreign languages might be shortchanged.

Clearly, both sides of this argument have merit. If we expect to prepare our future generations to succeed in a global economy, we simply must raise the bar in education.

But Colorado has traditionally given local school districts a great deal of control over curriculum and other priorities. That’s not something to be dismissed lightly.

There’s also the problem of legislators creating yet another unfunded mandate for state public schools, which already are struggling to recover from years of inadequate funding, while also trying to comply with numerous existing state and federal program and testing requirements.

Perhaps the statehouse isn’t the best place from which to be increasing high school math and science requirements. But that doesn’t mean the change doesn’t need to be made.

Rep. Nancy Todd, D-Aurora, is sponsoring an alternate bill, HB-1118. It would require the state board of education to adopt minimum high school graduation guidelines, which local districts would then be expected to use to establish graduation requirements tailored to their own communities’ specific needs.

Let’s hope the legislature sees fit to support this more flexible approach.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Economic development · Education · Public policy

Venture capital hot spots

March 23, 2007 · No Comments

Boulder edged out Salt Lake City in a recent ranking of the top U.S. second-tier cities for venture capital investment.

The two cities took the top spots for the number of VC deals completed from 2003 through mid 2005. The rankings were part of a Federal Reserve Bank of Boston study (pdf copy here) of how venture capital investments are distributed outside of the traditional VC hot spots of Silicon Valley, Boston, New York City, Texas, and Los Angeles.

Highest-performing
U.S. Secondary Cities

1 Boulder, CO
2 Salt Lake City, UT
3 Westborough, MA
4 Ann Arbor, MI
5 Norwalk, CT
6 Providence, RI
7 Southborough, MA
8 Stamford, CT
9 Melbourne, FL
10 New Haven, CT

Source: Initiative for a Competitive
Inner City. Cities ranked by number
of private equity deals per city.

Actual deal numbers were not disclosed, so there’s no way to tell how much of a lead the two cities had over other locales.

The rankings were in an article that focused mainly on the economic importance of venture capital, and how New England secondary cities can attract more of it.

The authors — Prabal Chakrabarti and Carole Carlson — identified six factors that help top secondary cities attract more venture capital than their peers:

  • Clusters and Networks. “Geographic concentrations of interconnected companies, specialized suppliers and service providers” in particular fields were deemed the most valuable factor, along with personal networks and professional societies.
  • Investor Presence. Also key was having an already established investor presence, including “angel” investors.
  • Historical Returns. Not surprisingly, the ability to attract reason-
    able returns on investments was important, while below-average returns were found (duh!) to deter investment.
  • Intellectual Capital and Technology Transfer. There was a strong correlation between deal flow and the presence of national research universities.
  • Community Attractiveness. Quality of life also was strongly correlated with the ability to attract venture capital.
  • Accessibility. Direct transportation links to major funding centers was important in helping VCs find and vet deals, as well as serve as company board members and mentors.

The good news for Boulder is that it appears to have plenty of the “secret sauce” needed to attract serious venture capital players.

The bad news? All secondary cities combined received just 13% of the deals and 20% of total investment dollars, despite having 51% of the U.S. population, 49% of the number of business establishments, and 38 percent of the U.S. payroll.

So don’t uncork the champagne yet. There’s plenty of work still to do if Boulder — and the rest of Colorado — hope to break into the ranks of the country’s truly top-tier VC capitals.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Economic development · Venture capital

Boulder baseball breakthrough?

March 22, 2007 · No Comments

Baseball season’s just around the corner, and a press release from Boulder’s RevFire Corp. is on the wires today, touting the RevFire training and evaluation tool for pitchers. The company’s patented system enables precise and reliable measurement of the spin rate of pitched softballs or baseballs.

Many baseball teams use radar guns to measure the speed of pitches. But until now there were no tools to measure spin. Strong spin is required to put ‘movement’ on a fastball or to throw effective curveballs, sliders, sinkers, or screwballs.

RevFire has developed a handheld monitor to precisely measure both the spin rate and speed of pitched balls. The monitor does not need to be pointed, and can be held by a coach or placed anywhere within 40 feet of the catcher.

The company’s $398 system relies on specially constructed leather-covered balls that are official size and weight with yarn-wound cores, but cannot be hit by a bat or used in games (presumably because that could damage the embedded chips inside). The RevFire balls cost $40 each and have black stitching to distinguish them from typical red-stitched game balls.

No word from the company on whether any of the pros are using the system at spring training camps, but a recent Northern Colorado Business Report article reports that Oklahoma State University has purchased the RevFire system for its softball team.

RevFire quotes Mike White, a member of the USA National Men’s Fastpitch Softball team as saying that he envisions spin rate measurements becoming “as common in judging pitchers in the future as MPH is today.”

RevFire founder and president David Marinelli is a former design engineer for AT&T Bell Labs and Ball Aerospace. He says that the highlight of his baseball career was pitching for his St. Linus grade school team in Dearborn Heights, Michigan “many years ago.”

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Innovation · Sports technology

Cable Labs stymies broadcasters

March 21, 2007 · No Comments

Louisville-based Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. is enabling cable TV operators to make what one analyst calls “an end run” around local broadcasters by developing new set-top boxes that will let viewers watch programs broadcast by local TV stations, as well as their usual cable TV programs.

Cable Labs, a research group supported by the nation’s cable companies, says the new boxes will let consumers tune in local broadcast channels currently not provided by their local cable company.

Sounds reasonable enough. But the Boston Globe newspaper reported yesterday that the move actually looks like a negotiating ploy to give cable companies more leverage with local broadcasters, who increasingly want to be paid by cable operators that carry their channels.

It’s a contentious issue because even though those signals are provided free to over-the-air viewers, cable companies are profiting by re-selling the signals as part of their services.

The boxes — which could go into production as soon as this year — should make it harder for local broadcasters to cut off signals to cable operators, as Baltimore’s Sinclair Broadcast Group threatened to do in several markets before this year’s Super Bowl game. The dispute was settled for undisclosed terms two days before the game.

→ No CommentsCategories: Broadcasting · Colorado tech · Communications · Media

Boulder innnovator’s insights

March 21, 2007 · No Comments

The Creative Generalist blog yesterday posted a fascinating interview with Adrian Chernoff, the Chief Creative Officer of Ideation Genesis, an innovation company based in Boulder.

Chernoff — a mechanical engineer whose varied career has included stints at General Motors, Disney, NASA and the Sandia and Los Alamos national laboratories — has generated 50 U.S. patents and 12 international patents. He’s worked on everything from new and improved rubber bands (Rubber Bandits™) to theme park rides to cars of the future, and says he’s currently developing a new drink product.

For some thought-provoking ideas on creativity, the process of innovation and the importance of patents, check out this timely article. Also, check out Chernoff’s Muzz.com website, which celebrates the contributions of people like the Muppets’ Jim Henson and inventor Nikola Tesla, whose ideas have changed the world.

New factories are always helpful. But let’s never forget that it’s creative, entrepreneurial individuals like Chernoff that will truly power Colorado’s tech economy into the next century.

→ No CommentsCategories: Beverages · Colorado tech · Economic development · Innovation

Wind plant picks Windsor

March 20, 2007 · 2 Comments

Northern Colorado economic development officials breathed a sigh of relief Tuesday when Denmark’s Vestas Wind Systems (Copenhagen exchange: VWS) concluded months of negotiations with the announcement it will build its first U.S. wind turbine blade factory in Windsor’s Great Western Industrial Park, east of Fort Collins.vestas-turbine.jpg

Construction of the $60 million factory will begin this spring, with production expected to start in early 2008. The plant should eventually have the capacity to produce 1,200 blades per year, while employing about 400 people.

The Greeley Tribune reported last week that worker salaries will average about $32,000 annually, and that the town of Windsor has agreed to waive $560,000 in development fees, plus 50 percent of its usual personal property taxes for 10 years.

A few years ago Vestas reportedly considered building the plant near Portland, Oregon — the site of its U.S. headquarters. But it settled on Colorado for a variety of reasons.

The Northern Colorado Business Report says the company was attracted here, among other reasons, because:
• It wanted to be close to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s Wind Technology Center (located between Golden and Boulder, near the former Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant).
• The Windsor site offers rail access and a central U.S. location that’s amenable to shipping huge blades — measuring half the length of a football field — throughout North America.
• Colorado’s recent passage of Amendment 37, which will require large investments in wind farms and other renewable energy sources.
• An abundance of skilled aerospace employees, including some displaced from Lockheed Martin Corp.

Vestas said in November that it planned to open two plants in 2007 — one in the U.S. and the other in Spain. The Jutland-based company already operates plants in Denmark, Germany, India, Italy, Britain, Sweden, Norway, Australia and China.

On Tuesday the company reported a 2006 operating profit of $267.4 million on sales of $5.1 billion, a sales increase of 7.5 percent. The company reported booming customer demand, but said that component shortages continued to hamper production.

Analysts estimate that Vestas had 25% of the global wind turbine market last year, ahead of GE, Enercon and Gamesa Eolica, each with about 15%. The company reportedly lost market share during 2006 following the entry of Germany’s Siemens into the U.S. market.

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Economic development · Energy and environment

Colorado biofuels center debuts

March 19, 2007 · No Comments

There’s no better way to look good these days than to associate yourself with alternative energy (and with good reason).

colocapitol2.jpg

That’s why a cluster of Colorado government and business leaders flocked to the state Capitol steps in Denver this morning. They were there to announce a new collaborative biofuels venture intended to make the state a more significant player in the emerging field of converting biomass into fuels and other products.

The press conference was expected to draw a cluster of state and national — albeit mostly Democratic — political figures, including U.S. Sen. Ken Salazar, U.S. Rep. Ed Perlmutter and Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter. The governor’s press office promised the event would showcase “great visuals” of renewable energy technologies the joint venture could help bring to the public, such as flex-fuel and biodiesel vehicles and materials — including shirts, plastic cups, cellulose paper — produced from biomass.

The new private-public venture is called the Colorado Center for Biorefining and Biofuels (C2B2).

Unfortunately, the C2B2 acronym already is being used by Columbia University’s Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, as well as a U.K.-based Internet consulting firm.

Nonetheless, the project, which Chemical and Engineering News reports took nine months to organize, should provide increased funds for numerous Colorado-based academic and U.S. government researchers who are working to accelerate the development of biofuels and biorefining technology.

University of Colorado chemical and biological engineering professor Alan W. Weimer will serve as the venture’s executive director. CU academics will be joined by researchers from Colorado State University, the Colorado School of Mines and the Golden-based National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).

Founding private-sector partners include Chevron Technology Ventures, ConocoPhillips, Dow Chemical Co. and Shell Global Solutions, which reportedly will pay $50,000 annually for royalty-free, nonexclusive rights to jointly developed intellectual property.

The project marks the second time in recent months that NREL and the three state universities have agreed to work together in developing renewable energy technology. In February, CU, CSU, the School of Mines and NREL agreed to create a “collaboratory” for cooperative renewable energy research in the state. The Colorado Renewable Energy Collaboratory is intended to help state research institutions compete for private and public research projects to increase the production and use of energy from renewable resources.

The new biofuels center project is welcome and well-intended, and the companies deserve credit for their participation. But don’t expect cheap Colorado-grown biofuels to solve our energy needs overnight. The Rocky Mountain Institute suggests that biofuels, along with with more efficient cars, are at best likely to displace 3.7 million barrels per day of crude oil— one-fifth of forecasted U.S. consumption — by 2025.

→ No CommentsCategories: Biotech · Colorado tech · Economic development · Energy and environment

Springs’ Intel loss is China’s gain

March 16, 2007 · No Comments

Chip-making giant Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC) still hasn’t confirmed this week’s announcement by China’s government that it has won approval for a new $2.5 billion chip fabrication plant in northwest China. But the story’s now been reported by nearly every major news organization, including China’s official Xinhua “People’s Daily” newspaper, so the chances of the deal being consummated seem increasingly likely.

The news comes less than two months after Intel announced plans to sell its Colorado Springs semiconductor plant, which the company bought in 2000. Up to 1,000 workers may be laid off if a buyer is not found that wants to continue operating the plant. Intel briefly flirted with further expansion in the Springs in 2002, before dropping plans to buy land for a second production plant near the city’s airport.

intel-sign.jpg

Intel in Colorado Springs

Meanwhile, Intel announced a couple of weeks ago that it will spend up to $1.5 billion to re-tool its Rio Rancho fabrication plant, or fab, near Albuquerque, N.M., to produce chips using its next-generation 45-nanometer technology.

What’s it all about? Why is the world’s largest chip-maker apparently getting out of Colorado, while expanding and opening new facilities elsewhere?

Under pressure
Intel, whose sales declined nearly 9% last year, is coming under increasing competitive pressure from arch-rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (NYSE: AMD). And with a relatively new CEO — Paul Otellini — at the helm, Intel is re-thinking many of its product and manufacturing strategies. It’s announced plans in recent months to lay off more than 10,000 workers, while diversifying into new markets, such as NAND flash memory chips, and bailing out of communications chips and other areas that have been less successful than it had hoped.

So what do China and New Mexico have that Colorado doesn’t?

In the case of China, the attraction clearly is easier access to the world’s biggest potential consumer market, which boasts several hundred million increasingly affluent middle-class buyers. China also has become the electronics manufacturing capital of the world, consuming some $37 billion worth of chips last year. And despite its lingering reputation as a backwards Third World locale, China’s universities are turning out many thousands of bright, disciplined and relatively low-cost, engineers every year, making it an attractive recruiting spot.

As for New Mexico, Intel’s Fab 11X there is one of the company’s largest and most advanced facilities, equipped with state-of-the-art clean-room and automated materials-handling equipment. A few years ago it was the first Intel plant upgraded to handle the latest 12-inch silicon wafers. Intel has been operating in New Mexico since 1980, and now employs more than 5,000 people there.

What Intel has in New Mexico is deep roots, as well as a massive multi-billion-dollar investment in leading-edge production facilities.

Aging facilities, little investment
Its Colorado Springs fab, on the other hand, dates back to the early 1980s, when it was built by Mostek, before being sold to United Technologies, then Rockwell, then Intel. Although the aging facility has been updated several times, it was never designed for today’s latest manufacturing technology.

Colorado Springs made sense for Intel nearly a decade ago when the company was seeking lower-cost U.S. locales outside of Silicon Valley to recruit new talent and build chips, while trying to avoid over-dependence on its operations in New Mexico and Arizona. Since then, however, the company has begun shifting more of its manufacturing investment abroad, first to Ireland and Israel, then to Vietnam, and now China.

Farewell to U.S. chip manufacturing?
Chip making in the U.S. is simply less viable than it used to be, especially with foreign governments willing to offer billions of dollars in tax breaks and other incentives to attract new factories, plus access to barely tapped pools of workers who’ll work for far lower wages than Americans.

A handful of companies, including Texas Instruments, are still building new chip fabs in the U.S. But for the most part, the industry’s future manufacturing expansion will take place overseas. Even much of the chip design still being done here will soon be heading abroad.

The lesson for Colorado — and other U.S. states that wish to remain players in the $260 billion chip industry — is to focus on retaining as much of the marketing, finance, administration, logistics and other support operations as possible. Even more important is to do whatever it takes to foster and nurture the development of new fabless chip companies.

Sure, we should try to hang onto the manufacturing facilities we already have, for as long as we can. But don’t count on them staying forever. For most chip companies, manufacturing has become just another commoditized service to be outsourced. The headquarters is still what counts.

As long as Colorado and other regional U.S. semiconductor centers remain attractive places to live for those who run the industry’s established companies — and the entrepreneurs and financiers who launch new chip ventures — we still have a chance of staying in the game.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Economic development · Semiconductors

Ascent Solar soars on Norsk buy

March 15, 2007 · No Comments

Shares of Littleton’s Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (Nasdaq: ASTI) were one of the hottest items on the Nasdaq stock exchange on Wednesday, soaring 89% on news that Norway’s Norsk Hydro ASA (NYSE: NHY) bought 23% of the Colorado company for $9.2 million.

Ascent — which is developing thin-film copper-indium-gallium-diselenide (CIGS) photovoltaic cells that can be manufactured on flexible, low-cost plastic substrates — also gave Norsk Hydro an option to purchase another 12% of its shares later this year, subject to stockholder approval.

Ascent plans to build a 1.5 megawatt (MW) per year pilot manufacturing plant in the Denver area in 2008. By 2010 it aims to begin large-scale production from a 25 MW plant.

Smart Money writer Will Swarts, whose article on Ascent yesterday was headlined “One Day Wonder,” notes that the company’s market cap soared from $25 million on Monday to $34 million in just two days.

At this morning’s peak share price of $9.43, the company’s market cap briefly flirted with the $50 million mark before settling back to $43 million (@7.99 a share) by the end of the trading day.

Still, it’s not too bad for company that spun off last year from Littleton government contractor ITN Energy Systems Inc., went public in July at $5.50 a share (raising $16.5 million) and has languished at $2 to $3 a share until this month.

The solar energy industry — which got a boost last week from the US Energy Department’s plan to provide up to$168 million in development funds for 13 solar energy projects — suddenly has become one of Wall Street’s darlings.

But investors would do well to exercise caution, and avoid being swept up in what New York Times writer Matt Richtel on Wednesday referred to as the next “watt-com” boom.

→ No CommentsCategories: Colorado tech · Energy and environment · Investing · Mergers/Acquisitions

Array BioPharma strikes license deal

March 14, 2007 · No Comments

Boulder’s Array BioPharma Inc. (Nasdaq: ARRY) agreed this week to license the exclusive worldwide rights to its toll-like receptor (TLR) program to San Diego’s VentiRx Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Financial terms were not disclosed, but Array will receive an equity stake in VentiRx as well as an upfront payment, potential milestone payments and royalties on product sales. Array also gets an option to acquire a 50% ownership in all VentiRx clinical oncology products developed under the deal.

TLRs are proteins that recognize microbes that have breached physical barriers such as the skin or intestinal tract. They are believed to play a key role in activating immune system responses. VentiRx plans to build upon Array’s research to develop novel drugs that either activate or block TLRs in the body. TLR-based drugs are considered a promising approach to treating a variety of ailments, including cancer, hepatitis, lupus and other autoimmune diseases.

Array is focused mainly on developing drugs for the treatment of cancer and inflammatory disease. The company has identified several promising drug candidates, some of which have been licensed to AstraZeneca and Genentech for further development and testing.

The company, which reported a $45 million loss on sales of about $40 million during the year ended Dec. 31, was fou